Wednesday, December 19, 2007

Reasons for Rob Fassett's departure

The Examiner 18 December 2007

DANIELLE BLEWETT looks back at the departure of Professor Rob Fassett as the LGH's director of medicine.

ON Friday, November 16, Rob Fassett was out on an early morning bike ride when he spotted a newspaper poster that read: "Fassett told to go".
It made him pedal faster.

"I had already resigned and I was always planning to go," he said.

The hospital's long-standing director of medicine did not go quietly.

But what triggered Professor Fassett's move to speak publicly about his concerns for the future of the LGH?

Aged 55, with 21 years at the hospital and 16 years as its director of medicine, he was well- equipped to speak about the hospital.

Regularly during 2007, he has brought the hospital to the front pages of this newspaper.

A good day, says the hospital's chief executive Stephen Ayre, is a day when the hospital isn't on the front page of The Examiner.

In April, when a senior Hobart bureaucrat asked one of his Northern colleagues how they could stop all the negative publicity surrounding the hospital. The reply was: "Simple: Give them the $10 million they are under budget."

Prof. Fassett laments that meaningful change still isn't on the horizon.

"The only regret I have is that we weren't listened to," he said.

"I have absolutely no regrets about speaking out publicly.

"I know I have not had the full support of my colleagues who may not realise for some years that I was right.

"I certainly had no support from the Health Department or the Government.

"The reassuring thing is that people say `thank you'. But I haven't really achieved much. It's disappointing to have to say that nothing has changed."

Wins by the Australian Nursing Federation in November, got the hospital another 29 nurses.

But the LGH continues to be stretched and many staff are still at breaking point.

The emergency department is constantly functioning on the cusp of disaster, according to a staff specialist.

Elsewhere, failure to recruit means the hospital is still short two oncologists, an interventional cardiologist, an endocrinologist and a renal locum.

The centralising of vascular surgery to the Royal Hobart Hospital was the starting point for Prof. Fassett.

He has seen many cycles of bust and boom within his hospital.

"I never got over the fact that we lost vascular," Prof. Fassett said.

"It was like a stone in my shoe. Such poor planning to allow that to happen. That was the baseline of my discontent. They can say that the LGH has not been downgraded but anyone who says we are not being downgraded is deluding themselves."

Prof. Fassett lost all trust in the Health Minister or the Health Department after the release of the Clinical Services Plan in May.

"I was deluded when I believed the Health Minister was listening to us when they were consulting for the Clinical Services Plan.

"They did not listen. They just paid us lip service. When the document came out I could see clearly in black and white that we were being downgraded to make way for the new Royal Hobart Hospital.

"A few weeks after the CSP was released we had bed closures. It was then blatantly obvious that we had been tricked.

"The document was the real trigger. The CSP made it obvious what the government's plan was for the North of the State.

"This was quickly accentuated by the CSP's ham fisted implementation in the North-West. It was handled with rhetoric not reality.

"If that is the way the rest of the plan is going to happen, that doesn't inspire confidence."

By August, Prof. Fassett was clear he would not continue as director of medicine in 2008.

He announced his resignation from the hospital's executive, effective October 2008, to pursue 36, ongoing research projects and work in private practice.

He anguishes over leaving the director's job during a crisis.

"One flaw I see in myself is `Rob' is fine when things are going really well. When I see my department being degraded and staff not being recruited and find we are being downsized and I leave at that point; I wonder should I stay with the ship? There are certain points in your career when it comes time to move on."

Being outspoken has caused friction with some of his colleagues.

He says they are angered that as one of the most ardent sticklers to the hospital's code of conduct he has broken all of the rules.

"There has been some conflict. When you have conflict with your managers and something as substantial as the bureaucracy it would be crazy to say it has had no impact on me," he said.

"I am a clinician not an administrator. That is a difficult blend. Your decisions have an impact on people's lives and it brings a conscience to your decision making."

Prof. Fassett, who travels to Burnie every Thursday to provide a renal clinic, says the fight to improve services at the LGH didn't quite overshadow his year.

"It has consumed some degree of my energy but I still see patients, still bike ride, still drink coffee.

"The only cost has been my relationship with some of my colleagues, particularly those who didn't see the world the same way I see it. Some have been critical of me that I have been vocal when the rules say I shouldn't."

It's almost a year since Prof. Fassett first went public with his fears about centralising of vascular surgery.

"I believe it was worth it because the number of people who came up to me on the street or in consultation who would say "thank you" for what your have done. That makes me more clearly believe it was worth it.

"The majority of people in Launceston believe they are not getting a fair deal in Northern Tasmania.

"We might not be getting an outcome now but by 2010 hopefully when they are voting the politicians will get their judgment."

He remains totally unimpressed with the performance by Bass Labor MHAs Michelle O'Byrne and Jim Cox who have been silent all year.

The only politician he believes actually "got it" with the LGH was defeated Bass Liberal MHR Michael Ferguson.

After 16 years in one of medicine's most powerful roles, Prof. Fassett has no regrets.

"I will miss not having some input into the way services develop in Northern Tasmania. However, I won't miss dealing with the bureaucracy and I won't miss aspects like paper work and conflict resolution (among staff).

"I will miss my team: Andrea, Karen and Catherine.

"But this is only one part of my job. I am a clinician and the greatest impact I can have is taking the time to consult with patients."

No comments: